[
  {
    "id": "a2a-agent2agent-protocol",
    "data": {
      "title": "Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol documentation",
      "url": "https://a2a-protocol.org/latest/",
      "source": "Linux Foundation / A2A Protocol Working Group",
      "consumed": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "A2A is an open agent-to-agent interoperability protocol, originally developed by Google and donated to the Linux Foundation, with concepts for client agents acting on behalf of users, remote agent servers, agent cards, task lifecycles, modality negotiation, and secure opaque collaboration.",
      "tags": [
        "agents",
        "protocols",
        "orchestration",
        "interoperability"
      ]
    },
    "body": "A2A is evidence that agent-to-agent communication is hardening into an explicit product and infrastructure boundary. Its core model separates a client agent, which acts on behalf of a user, from remote agent servers that publish capabilities and take on tasks without exposing their internal tools, memory, or execution details.\n\nThis matters because it gives the imagined worker-agent layer a plausible protocol substrate. MCP makes tools and resources reachable by an agent; A2A makes other agents reachable as peers, specialists, or delegated workers."
  },
  {
    "id": "adobe-firefly-agentic-creative-control",
    "data": {
      "title": "Adobe Firefly AI Assistant and agentic creative controls",
      "url": "https://news.adobe.com/news/2026/04/adobe-new-creative-agent",
      "source": "Adobe",
      "consumed": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "Adobe describes Firefly AI Assistant as a conversational creative agent for multi-step workflows, with expanded video and image editing, advanced controls, precision adjustments, and more than 30 creative AI models.",
      "tags": [
        "ai",
        "design",
        "generative-ai",
        "art"
      ]
    },
    "body": "Adobe's 2026 Firefly announcement is a clear signal that generative image and design tools are moving toward high-fidelity, production-grade, controllable creative systems.\n\nIf controlled synthetic finish becomes ordinary, the cultural premium may move toward work that feels difficult to imitate as a process: idiosyncratic, compulsive, materially specific, and not optimized for promptable taste."
  },
  {
    "id": "anthropic-claude-code-review-pricing",
    "data": {
      "title": "Claude Code Review pricing",
      "url": "https://code.claude.com/docs/en/code-review#pricing",
      "source": "Anthropic",
      "consumed": "2026-05-16T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "Anthropic documents Claude Code Review as token-billed, separate from included plan usage, with each review averaging $15-25 depending on PR size, codebase complexity, and verification work.",
      "tags": [
        "agents",
        "code-review",
        "pricing"
      ]
    },
    "body": "Anthropic's managed code review product prices automated PR review like a serious unit of engineering labor rather than like a cheap chat completion. The useful signal is the average cost band: high enough to shock individuals, but calibrated against the price of catching real defects in a codebase."
  },
  {
    "id": "anthropic-claude-managed-agents",
    "data": {
      "title": "Claude Managed Agents overview",
      "url": "https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/managed-agents/overview",
      "source": "Anthropic",
      "consumed": "2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "Anthropic documents Managed Agents as a pre-built, configurable harness with managed infrastructure, cloud environments, tools, MCP servers, skills, sessions, and long-running execution.",
      "tags": [
        "agents",
        "harnesses",
        "marketplaces"
      ]
    },
    "body": "Anthropic's Managed Agents documentation is an early signal that agent harnesses are becoming productized units: not just model calls, but named agents, configured environments, tools, MCP servers, skills, sessions, state, and managed execution."
  },
  {
    "id": "art-basel-ubs-global-art-market-report-2026",
    "data": {
      "title": "The Art Basel and UBS Global Art Market Report 2026",
      "url": "https://www.artbasel.com/stories/the-art-basel-and-ubs-global-art-market-report-2026?lang=en",
      "source": "Art Basel / UBS",
      "consumed": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "The 2026 report puts 2025 global art market sales at $59.6B, up 4% year-on-year after two years of declining values, with uneven recovery and continuing recalibration.",
      "tags": [
        "art",
        "markets",
        "investing"
      ]
    },
    "body": "The 2026 Art Basel/UBS report provides the market backdrop: art remains a large asset and collecting market, but one that is uneven, status-sensitive, and periodically hungry for new categories of conviction.\n\nFor a prediction about Art Brut becoming an investment target, the relevant premise is that collectors and dealers already operate inside a market capable of rotating attention, pricing narratives, and liquidity toward newly legible categories."
  },
  {
    "id": "art-brut-wikipedia",
    "data": {
      "title": "Art brut",
      "url": "https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_brut",
      "source": "Wikipedia",
      "consumed": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "The German Art brut entry traces Jean Dubuffet's concept of alternative art outside established cultural art, including the Compagnie de l'Art brut and the Lausanne collection.",
      "tags": [
        "art",
        "art-brut",
        "outsider-art"
      ]
    },
    "body": "Art Brut names a field whose value is partly tied to its refusal of polish, training, and official art-world legibility. The useful market intuition is not simply that these works are \"raw\", but that they sit at a cultural angle to professionalized aesthetic control.\n\nThat angle may become more valuable as generative image systems make high-fidelity finish cheap, abundant, and increasingly programmable."
  },
  {
    "id": "haai-human-to-agent-to-agents-interface-working-term",
    "data": {
      "title": "HAAI (human-to-agent-to-agents interface) as working term",
      "source": "Tom",
      "consumed": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "Working intention: HAAI names the user-to-orchestrator-to-worker-agents chain, where human intent, permissions, context, and approval pass through an always-on agent that delegates work to specialized agents.",
      "tags": [
        "agents",
        "interfaces",
        "orchestration"
      ]
    },
    "body": "HAAI is a working term for the chain where a person deals with an agentic system through an orchestrator agent, and that orchestrator then delegates parts of the work to other agents. It is short for human-to-agent-to-agents interface: not just a user talking to software, but a user talking to an agent that can instantiate, route, supervise, and reconcile work from further agents.\n\nIn this frame, OpenClaw, Claude on a user's machine, a managed ChatGPT workspace agent, or a similar always-on personal/workplace orchestrator is not merely a chat interface. For a task like building a full-stack app, it becomes the first agent in a chain: the proxy for intent, authority, context, approval, and taste, which can spin up worker agents specialized through their harnesses and hold the relationship with the human while they do the delegated work."
  },
  {
    "id": "hiscox-ai-generated-art-collector-concerns",
    "data": {
      "title": "What is the future of AI-generated art?",
      "url": "https://www.hiscoxgroup.com/news/blog/what-future-ai-generated-art",
      "source": "Hiscox",
      "consumed": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "Hiscox discusses collector concerns around AI-generated art, including authenticity, originality, labeling, and nervousness about value retention.",
      "tags": [
        "ai",
        "art",
        "markets",
        "authenticity"
      ]
    },
    "body": "The important signal is not that AI art has no market. It is that collectors are already asking whether an AI-generated object has enough authorship, scarcity, originality, and value durability to behave like art rather than like technical output.\n\nThat anxiety creates room for an opposite thesis: works with unmistakable human pressure, marginality, and non-instrumental making may become easier for collectors to believe in."
  },
  {
    "id": "openai-codex-pricing",
    "data": {
      "title": "Codex pricing",
      "url": "https://developers.openai.com/codex/pricing",
      "source": "OpenAI",
      "consumed": "2026-05-16T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "OpenAI's Codex pricing page lists Pro from $100/month, with higher Codex usage than Plus and a temporary 2x usage promo on the $100/month tier through May 31, 2026.",
      "tags": [
        "agents",
        "codex",
        "pricing"
      ]
    },
    "body": "OpenAI's Codex pricing page creates a sharp comparison point for automated review economics: a $100/month Pro seat can feel expansive for hands-on agentic coding, even though it is still governed by usage limits."
  },
  {
    "id": "openai-workspace-agents-chatgpt",
    "data": {
      "title": "Introducing workspace agents in ChatGPT",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/introducing-workspace-agents-in-chatgpt/",
      "source": "OpenAI",
      "consumed": "2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z",
      "note": "OpenAI introduces shared, Codex-powered workspace agents in ChatGPT, with templates, Slack deployment, team sharing, governance, analytics, and credit-based pricing.",
      "tags": [
        "agents",
        "app-stores",
        "marketplaces"
      ]
    },
    "body": "OpenAI's Workspace Agents announcement shows the same motion from the other side: agents as shared, reusable workplace objects that can be templated, governed, deployed into ChatGPT or Slack, measured, and billed through credits."
  }
]